It appears you’re ignoring any role a future Senate, with a lame-duck like Tillis or not, could play in not rubber-stamping irresponsible Trump appointees. That’s understandable given recent evidence of a missing Republican spine, but it’s still disappointing. It suggests that the best hope for long-term fiscal prudence has to include shorter-term political reform.
I read a good article recently about how one part of Powell's legacy will be how the chair used to work toward consensus, but in response to Trump's meddling, it seems Powell has encouraged dissent at the FOMC votes. In a way, he gave power to the panel members and underlined that the chair is just one voice and one view.
Sounds good to me, I hope it works out the way you say. We don't need more sycophants especially in the FED Reserve. We need common sense and legitimate people to keep our economy on the right track!
It appears you’re ignoring any role a future Senate, with a lame-duck like Tillis or not, could play in not rubber-stamping irresponsible Trump appointees. That’s understandable given recent evidence of a missing Republican spine, but it’s still disappointing. It suggests that the best hope for long-term fiscal prudence has to include shorter-term political reform.
I read a good article recently about how one part of Powell's legacy will be how the chair used to work toward consensus, but in response to Trump's meddling, it seems Powell has encouraged dissent at the FOMC votes. In a way, he gave power to the panel members and underlined that the chair is just one voice and one view.
Sounds good to me, I hope it works out the way you say. We don't need more sycophants especially in the FED Reserve. We need common sense and legitimate people to keep our economy on the right track!