I listened to this this morning and it was a great interview. Coincidentally, I listened to the latest episode Cowen's own podcast, featuring a conversation with his co-author, a couple of days ago. I usually like Cowen's podcast but really did not enjoy this episode, the book sounded like a typical VC/tech bro project and I had no interest in reading it.
Josh drew Tyler out on a broader range of issues associated with "talent" and matching, and made the book seem much more interesting as a result. Well done!
This reminds of an interesting interview question I wish I could ask if I was on an interview panel: “on a scale of 1-10, how much of an attorney are you?” (Obviously this is for atty positions) The question is so open ended and the number is left to the interviewee’s interpretation
I listened to this this morning and it was a great interview. Coincidentally, I listened to the latest episode Cowen's own podcast, featuring a conversation with his co-author, a couple of days ago. I usually like Cowen's podcast but really did not enjoy this episode, the book sounded like a typical VC/tech bro project and I had no interest in reading it.
Josh drew Tyler out on a broader range of issues associated with "talent" and matching, and made the book seem much more interesting as a result. Well done!
This reminds of an interesting interview question I wish I could ask if I was on an interview panel: “on a scale of 1-10, how much of an attorney are you?” (Obviously this is for atty positions) The question is so open ended and the number is left to the interviewee’s interpretation
“Disagreeable” people, seem to make good entrepreneurs. That’s been my experience. Any truth to this?
I enjoyed this episode even more than usual. Thanks!